Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:57

What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Fans slam Gearbox CEO Randy Pitchford's message to "cost sensitive" fans - Eurogamer
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What should be done after the attack on Donald Trump to abandon vicious partisan rhetoric?
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
WWDC 2025: New Features We Could See in watchOS 26 - MacRumors
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Webb telescope images frigid exoplanet in strange orbit - Phys.org
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Who was the actor least deserving of an Academy Award?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How do modern fantasy authors approach diversity differently than previous generations?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.